friedbananazzzz
New Member
My eyes are blue, and I don't lie about there being silver in them.
Posts: 47
|
Post by friedbananazzzz on Nov 12, 2008 19:56:29 GMT -5
Well, I think it's a little late to change anybody's vote now, but I'll at least try and get some thoughts across. For the record, I've got no role, just a plain ol' townie with no time. Le sigh. Going by the list from the first page/post: bobthewarrior: no proof, but I don't really trust him... people should focus a little more attention on scrutinizing him (better than I can at least). friedbananazzzz: soon to be dead, but townie Jason Maher: I'll buy the Band claim Liquid Evil: definitely not a wrassler, but there's always the chance of druggie or mystery. (bets on M; pro/anti is still up in the air on that one though) maatianna: meh, we've technically had the same playstyle this game, so nothing worthwhile can really be said. I voted for her early on on guts, but that's never useful to anybody else. muzzz: probably beat the RNG only to end up as druggie or mystery. (bets on D) nazdakka: was targeted, so not a wrestler, but I actually feel he's less likely to be druggie or mystery than Liq (or others). nolecub: see jason Noodle: doesn't stand out enough to me. water_moon: townie enough for me, she's done the RP thing before, I "figured" at least. raypatean: ah, I love the foo's, could be one of 4 things as far as I can see: 1) Mr T hiding in plain sight; awesome. 2) Trying to make anti-towns target him instead of the real Mr T; semi-helpful, but confusing for the town. 3) Anti-town purposely confusing town into thinking he's Mr T (either protecting himself from lynch, or drawing out real Mr T). (this is my least likely pick) 4) Just likes saying FOO' (!) because it's lots of fun, though that could also be a bonus to the previous 3 points... Pretty much *anybody* *could* be druggie or mystery, which really throws a wrench into looking for anti-towns, as they can go after the wrestlers just like the town. Ugh. Must be fun to play as those roles though, getting by undetected while I get lynched Vote: maatiContinuing my first vote. Band member or not, still unconfirmed.
|
|
|
Post by goltar on Nov 12, 2008 23:48:33 GMT -5
What's this about some newfangled Commodore 64? Some kind of computer they say? Bah, nobody will want it anyway, too much work involved. Especially when you can just sit down and watch some TV.
Anyway, to the business at hand. Seems like we're mostly in agreement to send friedbananazzzz to jail today. Well, lock him up. I'll go check his house.
Seems like he was telling the truth, nothing suspicious at all there. Well, we'll leave him locked up just to be safe. Good night everyone, and stay safe. We've likely still got some hoodlums out there, plotting nefarious deeds tonight.
friedbananazzzz was jailed, he was pro-town.
Day 3 is over, night 3 begins.
cygnus may post one message tonight.
|
|
|
Post by cygnus on Nov 13, 2008 21:40:25 GMT -5
Most of you seem to be of the opinion that it is next to impossible to identify the druggie. This is incorrect. What you need to do is to ask him politely to identify himself. Politeness goes a long way. And the druggie would then reply, "yeah, it's me. Now don't worry about me, just get the baddies, ok?" The druggie would be more willing to do that should he end up second-best in a late night wrestling match. On the very first night at that. That kinda puts one in a vindictive mood.
That shoud clear up most of the uncertainty. Nazdakka's clean and Liq's most probably good too. Add Jason and nolecub (no counterclaims = clean) and that's 4 out of 10 remaining. Another couple of role reveals (either T and cop or cop + cop target) and this game is in the bag.
Why reveal my role? Revenge, pure and simple. You take me out, you go down. And the next round starts sooner.
FWIW, Nazdakka was my first and only target. Evidently, there was no interesting effect that night.
FWIW part 2: I think w_m is the last of the wrestlers. She was Nac's target the first night and he wouldn't have had to come up with that preposterous reasoning unless the target was not chosen at random.
|
|
|
Post by goltar on Nov 13, 2008 23:42:49 GMT -5
Good morning everyone. I received another anonymous note this morning.
"You're washed up, finished! I'm the baddest in the world! Liquid Evil was under my protection last night, foo'! Signed: First name Mr, middle name 'period', last name T!"
It seems Liquid Evil was targeted last night, and our mysterious protector has been successful again. Well, hopefully we can find another of our criminals today and jail them.
Liquid Evil was attacked and protected.
Night 3 is over, Day 4 begins now.
|
|
|
Post by water_moon on Nov 14, 2008 0:00:03 GMT -5
While I was somewhat dis-inclined to trust much or care over hard for any input Cygie had other than maybe some number crunching, I find his druggie claim some what beliveable.
Either A, he was the hidden roll, aligned with the druggie AND covering for him. Or B, he was the drug drealer and wants payback.
Though that doesn't mean Naz or liquid aren't the suprise roll, but what do Naz and Liquid have in common?
@muzzz, why didn't you vote? you were the only one who didn't, you were active towards the end and had suspicions of people according to your posts, so why no action, oh most usual suspect?
Since I find it less likly that the hidden roll is a cover for the druggie or a false druggie (told he is but no effect) I belive his claim.
|
|
Liquid Evil
Full Member
The silver in my eyes cuts through any lies.
Posts: 219
|
Post by Liquid Evil on Nov 14, 2008 0:00:13 GMT -5
Lucky me.
@ Muzzz- Who should we lynch today? @ Noodle- Who should we lynch today?
|
|
|
Post by water_moon on Nov 14, 2008 0:12:43 GMT -5
whoops, got that out of order, last line should be right after the A/B options. And add to the reasoning of belief: if any one suffers the affects of drugs we'll know the claim was misleading.
Which gives me hope since our Private Eye is alive.
@fbz: sorry you were innocent sonny, but at least you put in a little something towards the end. As for Ray's little character acting you forgot option #5: he's trying to make folks think he's M. T to avoid being targeted by the druggie.
|
|
|
Post by bobthewarrior on Nov 14, 2008 7:07:48 GMT -5
@ L_E - Who should we lynch today?
I'm going to get going early, real life is not looking favorable for me having a lot of time to play.
vote: Noodle
I'm still trusting W_M for the moment. If Cygnus is right, there are 10 of us left, and apparently there is only one more wrestler (according to him), and the druggie is gone. That only leaves the hidden role as a possible anti-town person (besides the wrestler), so if he suspects W_M, we have a bit of time to figure that out if we're wrong.
I suspected Noodle previously, this is just a continuation of that suspicion, and it's added by the fact that he hasn't been around much, gone silent I'd guess you could say.
|
|
|
Post by Noodle on Nov 14, 2008 8:36:53 GMT -5
Gone silent, or managed to post at least a couple of times a day in the middle of a work week, Bob. Why the suspicion - any clues you'd care to share?
@ Liquid_evil - I'm inclined to follow Cygnus' gut feeling and go after Water_Moon. She's been inconsistent enough to raise a red flag, dropping multiple hints as if she's claiming a role, only to back off when challenged. either her, or my suspicions about Maatiana have been well documented in previous posts. What are your thoughts?
- Noodle
|
|
|
Post by raypatean on Nov 14, 2008 10:27:18 GMT -5
W_M: Of course you are going to be suspicious of what Cygnus said in his post....he called you out. If you weren't suspicious of it, you'd essentially be admitting that you are anti-town, and we all know you're a better player than that. I don't like your little statement about Magnum PI being alive, either. You try and make it seem like there is a good chance Magnum could be dead. I'd be willing to bet that Magnum PI is still alive, if only for the fact that there has been just one nightkill, and that was Cygnus...and you said that you believe his claim. Was FBZ Magnum, and didn't bother to claim before he died? I don't think so.
I got my eye on you, foo'!
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Nov 14, 2008 11:17:05 GMT -5
Vote:water_moon
Too much thought being put into it. What would be Cyg's motivation to lie?
If you are just a plain townie, then it is a safe lynch for the town and you won't put up a fight. If you claim PI, bring us someone to lynch today.
|
|
Liquid Evil
Full Member
The silver in my eyes cuts through any lies.
Posts: 219
|
Post by Liquid Evil on Nov 14, 2008 11:44:18 GMT -5
Here's my synopsis of Noodle, my favored lynch candidate for the day. I've listed all of his posts thus far and have commented on each. Ray busts out of the gate with a Mr. T impression . . . Is he just joking around, or is he trying to claim a role? Non-content post expressing interest in learning Ray Patean’s role. Seems to be pretty early to start casting votes, at least to me. I'd like to see some additional posts to help me make up my mind. Non-content post designed to appear helpful. “More people should post, but I’m not going to say anything that people need to respond to so that would happen.” It should also be noted that jlrafrance publicly agreed with Noodle’s sentiments in a following post. I don't know, I trust Goltar to be an impartial host, and I don't think Water_Moon would do anything dishonest or go mad with power. Anyone knows Murdock was the real hero on the A-Team. Complete non-content. I leave work in about an hour. On my drive home I will ponder (It's better than concentrating on all the traffic around me!) and post my suspicions when I get home. - Noodle Biding time. LOL at Liquid_Evil. Wow - such certainty based on . . what? Anything? The fact that I wanted to read posts and consider them? Yes, you're right, thoughtful playing is obviously a sign of evil. LOL! In spite of that, I don't think you're a wrestler. I'm thinking Muzzz is a wrestler. Just a gut feeling. - Noodle A good response to my accusations according to his usual style. However, naming someone "not a wrestler" is usually a good way to get them off of you. There's the possible hidden role, that I don't believe Goltar confirmed was in the game, and the druggie. Both are pretty much wild cards - the hidden role could have any type of power, while the effects of the druggie are random. Given this, it would be extremely difficult to ascertain a pattern, and hence make an educated guess. I'm not entirely sure how the Mullet Troll role works, or how to identify the person. I'm going to have to read posts and see who isn't making sense to try to reason it out. Speaking of not making sense, Jason, would you care to explain your vote for me? Maybe something beyond a simple "Why not?"? At this stage of the game, that looks pretty suspicious. JRLA, I'm going to go back and re-read the last seven pages of posts, and look for any mention of numbers. - Noodle “I don’t believe…I not entirely sure…explain your vote for me (are you a cop or was I suspicious?)…” Ends with the promise of research of numbers. Promise not fulfilled. I'd like to hear from Bobthewarrior as well. And a response from Jason. Making random accusations and not justifying them is very suspicious. JRLAFrance made an impassioned plea - I hope he is a wrestler, and it wasn't the emotional outburst of an innocent wrongly accused. - Noodle This post was designed to appear helpful AND question the validity of voting for jrlafrance. It’s an “is it really a good idea?” mentality that was designed to sway those truly on the fence in the wrong direction. And, Jason, that first Mafia round was quite awhile ago. I've played the last six games or so rather seriously. Go back and read the first two games in this forum, for Pete's sake. - Noodle Basically non-content. An appeal to past game roles means nothing in this one. Big props to Mr. T! Ray, are you insinuating that you are Mr. T? Seems risky. Translation: I’d like you to come forward with a roleclaim please. I need to know if you are really Mr. T or not. Yes, what "alibi" do you have? Translation: What was your night role??? I can understand the votes for fbz, but my antennae quiver when I read Maatiana's post. Laying low is a classic mafia technique, and I don't think we can rely on Jason's assertion that she's pro-townie. I agree that fbz's behavior is suspscious, but is it more so than Maati's? Just because she was recruited doesn't mean she's not a wrestler. Here he realizes that fbz is going to get it, but he’s looking to the future. Tomorrow he’ll need a new scapegoat. There’s been some anti-maati talk already so he’s throwing his voice in that direction so she will look like a better candidate for the future chopping block. Water_moon, you made some very compelling arguments about keeping a closer eye on Maati, but moving forward with fbz. Again a mention of Maati suspicions and a vote for fried. Gone silent, or managed to post at least a couple of times a day in the middle of a work week, Bob. Why the suspicion - any clues you'd care to share? @ Liquid_evil - I'm inclined to follow Cygnus' gut feeling and go after Water_Moon. She's been inconsistent enough to raise a red flag, dropping multiple hints as if she's claiming a role, only to back off when challenged. either her, or my suspicions about Maatiana have been well documented in previous posts. What are your thoughts? - Noodle He’s wondering why Bob voted him straight away and is assuming him to be the policeman with his questioning of clues. He also wants to follow the lynch train based off of a dead man’s suspicions. Coupled with his vote history on proven baddies: -Did not vote NacRuno, or at all, on the 1st day -The last person and 9th vote on jrlafrance the 2nd dayAnd he looks like the last of a gang of wrestlers to me. Vote: Noodle
|
|
|
Post by raypatean on Nov 14, 2008 12:00:12 GMT -5
Between the constant appeals to find out roles, and the voting history it seems that Noodle is a very good lynch target for today. I'm still suspicious of W_M after her posts today, but I'll let that go for now.
Vote: Noodle
|
|
|
Post by raypatean on Nov 14, 2008 12:00:36 GMT -5
Crap. I forgot it again...
I'm coming to get ya, foo'!
|
|
|
Post by muzzz on Nov 14, 2008 12:23:56 GMT -5
Trusting Jason and Nole is great, and sure, I'd believe that Maati was recruited by them. However, how can you completely trust her? I can't, and I don't. But Jason wanted to recruit her because he thinks she's a townie. I imagine he has a better read on Maati than most of us. So even though I don't trust Maati completely, she's got a lot more going for her than most other players. @muzzz, why didn't you vote? you were the only one who didn't, you were active towards the end and had suspicions of people according to your posts, so why no action, oh most usual suspect? Because by the time I had made up my mind, it didn't matter anymore. I suppose I could've left a symbolic vote, but people are about as likely to bash me for that as for not voting. @ Muzzz- Who should we lynch today? With the druggie out of the picture: Vote: NoodleSee previous posts for an explanation, and suggestions for who we should lynch tomorrow.
|
|