|
Post by nolecub on Dec 15, 2008 10:53:06 GMT -5
Computers cannot be trusted, reference H.A.L.
Vote: yes
Now to just figure out who you yahoo's are.
|
|
|
Post by Nazdakka on Dec 15, 2008 11:19:23 GMT -5
goltar: I'll use GMT -5 (US Eastern) then.
|
|
|
Post by muzzz on Dec 15, 2008 12:13:08 GMT -5
I don't see an equipment complaint form mentioning a chronograph. That means that any mention of chronograph problems must be either:
A) made by an individual who neglected to fill out the proper forms.
or
B) part of a conspiracy.
I'm certain that Friend Computer would correctly discipline anyone involved in the hypothetical case A. Which leaves me no choice but to assume hypothetical case B for the moment.
Vote: yes
|
|
|
Post by ricrestoni on Dec 15, 2008 12:46:12 GMT -5
Now now get along with me: either there is a conspiracy, and mutant commies are hiding among us, or there is not.
If there is such a conspiracy, mutant commies will try to mingle and convince us there is not a conspiracy. If there is not, there will be no such thing.
So all we gotta do is watch for people trying to mingle and convincing us there is no such thing as conspiracy.
At this point, Goltar and Jason.
Now Goltar said he will change his vote later. Jason said he won't buy it.
The question is: are those mutant commie traits (albeit somewhat reluctant)?
The answer is: no, not really
Besides, Goltar noticed how clean W_M is, and as hygiene officer, I will take that in consideration.
Vote: No
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Dec 15, 2008 13:30:15 GMT -5
Ric, you are contridicting your logic with your vote. How can you force any conspirators out of the woodwork if you say there is no conspiracy?
We don't have to find all the traitors, just one.
So the question I pose to you sir ric, how do we weed out the infedels?
|
|
|
Post by ricrestoni on Dec 15, 2008 14:09:05 GMT -5
Your question is a pertinent one, Nole, but I'm afraid a definite answer is not allowed for our security level.
We can, however, ponder. And in that pondering, even more questions arise.
How do we weed out the infidels? Hmm I guess if any of them shows any communist trait OR mutant behaviour, we have a spot-on. The problem is that I, not ever having seen these, couldn't tell them from other odd yet less treasonous behaviour.
Hence, if you want to find a conspirator, my final guess will be sorting out the people who blatantly accuse others of such, because that implies knowledge of how such evil organizations work, a thing one can only assume pertains to a traitor, no less.
Now, of the people, who made such implications?
No one.
One might assume Nazdaka made such inference when refering to those nightly posts (treason if I ever saw it!), but being he himself the voice of the computer, he is absolutely right, and is working for the sole purpose of the collective happiness.
Now, I question you, citizen Nole: Do you think the communist threat is now worse than ever? Why?
|
|
|
Post by soylentred on Dec 15, 2008 14:36:13 GMT -5
I am thinking along the same lines as Ric but rather than being contradictory I will:
Vote: yes
|
|
|
Post by soylentred on Dec 15, 2008 14:37:06 GMT -5
Vote: yes
|
|
|
Post by Nac Runo on Dec 15, 2008 17:07:26 GMT -5
If everyone vote no including the conspirators, then we do not have any discussion or chance of winning. On the other hand if most people vote yes than conspirators need to convince us otherwise. Voting no so early is just a way to tell conspirators to sit and watch.
Am i trying to convince you to vote yes...
vote:yes
|
|
|
Post by ricrestoni on Dec 15, 2008 17:36:13 GMT -5
Very well Nac!
unvote: no
vote: yes
|
|
|
Post by water_moon on Dec 15, 2008 18:15:39 GMT -5
Using my new leet clearance I erased from teh memory banks any activity from or pertaining only to night. /admin If everyone vote no including the conspirators The conspirators votes don't count.
|
|
|
Post by FIREHORSE on Dec 15, 2008 18:19:32 GMT -5
Last night was a mistake - sorry. I'm overseas and trying to get a clue as to when the times are. I'm awake when North America sleeps.
Anyway - The game. The logical assumption in a game such as this would be YES they're conspirators However if I created the game I would have no conspiracy. So with basically nothing to go on but a hunch I vote no
VOTE: NO
|
|
|
Post by water_moon on Dec 15, 2008 18:21:19 GMT -5
*read's nac runo's posts several times and has a horrible headache* umm, if there are no conspitors then they can not convince us to vote no *is glad she's in the clear* Am i trying to convince you to vote yes... are you trying to convince us to vote ( Failure to vote would be treason.) or to vote yes?
|
|
|
Post by water_moon on Dec 15, 2008 18:23:35 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]admin[/glow]@ firehorse: no edits
Also you have to use tags [] [/] with b for bold, i for itialic, etc. you can see the commands when you quote some one else if you have issues. Or just hit reply at the bottom of the thread and get the buttons to do it for you.
[glow=red,2,300]/admin[/glow]
|
|
|
Post by Nac Runo on Dec 15, 2008 18:38:05 GMT -5
I didn't want my previous vote to cause any headaches, sorry for that.
Conspirator votes count actually as they are as valid as non-conspirators' votes for the daily discussion. It is only Naz that doesn't count them at the end =).
|
|