sint
Full Member
Posts: 105
|
Post by sint on Mar 17, 2009 12:05:36 GMT -5
Okay just a personal note before continuing with the game.
I find it utterly rediculous that the PM written by nac is part of the discussion here. I find it bad that it has been brought up, worse that there is talk about the contents but utter madness that there is talk about comparing contents or identifying others doing so.
Please do not.
On a side note: as a non-native english speaker, how about trying to not use the ''big words'' in every way? I understand fully what's being said, but prefer plain english. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Mar 17, 2009 12:08:15 GMT -5
Soy - did you miss my post where I came out as the Jailkeeper?
Do you still believe I am not town?
|
|
sint
Full Member
Posts: 105
|
Post by sint on Mar 17, 2009 12:30:40 GMT -5
Alright, untill everyone has posted I'll believe nole. He'll probably won't get a counter claim anyway, but ofcourse I won't take it for granted untill everyone posted. I want to call it too early to see this nole vs soy thing through, but at least we can look for possible linkings between people. I'll bet my life on it that if soy is mafia, so is naz. I'll take a bit of a drastic turn here: vote firehorsefire, could you please back up your vote or take it off? Your game has been a bit off yesterday, but as we all know voting out people that didn't contribute to the game isn't going to help the town. Either restate what you want and keep your vote on noodle, or take it off and place it elsewhere. I'm using my vote as a weapon Oh and seriously, now is the time to vote people, remember that if we lynch a townie today the mafia has won. Let's get a good read on what's going on before mid day so we have another 24 hours to get things right. votes: naz 1 (soy) noodle 1 (fire) soy 1 (nole) That's in chronological order, so naz's head is on the block right now. Nole, you think the vig should claim too?
|
|
|
Post by Noodle on Mar 17, 2009 12:40:51 GMT -5
I have no reason not to believe Nole.
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Mar 17, 2009 13:07:03 GMT -5
No the vigalante should stay hidden. Up to the mafia on who to hit then...me or a 33% chance on the vigalante. Let keep some suspense.
|
|
|
Post by soylentred on Mar 17, 2009 13:17:31 GMT -5
Soy - did you miss my post where I came out as the Jailkeeper? Do you still believe I am not town? Yes I just came in from my run and I was mulling that very fact. Why did I get called out for a supposedly half role claim when I wasn't in danger and you just out of no where come up with jailkeeper claim. Why did you claim that role now?
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Mar 17, 2009 13:20:15 GMT -5
Because the more information the town has about who is left, the better. The vigalante needs not to be known until the hit has been completed. Contradiction- yes, but I see my role as not as important as that of the vig.
|
|
|
Post by soylentred on Mar 17, 2009 13:24:11 GMT -5
Okay just a personal note before continuing with the game. I find it utterly rediculous that the PM written by nac is part of the discussion here. I find it bad that it has been brought up, worse that there is talk about the contents but utter madness that there is talk about comparing contents or identifying others doing so. Please do not. On a side note: as a non-native english speaker, how about trying to not use the ''big words'' in every way? I understand fully what's being said, but prefer plain english. Thanks. Sint - I'm sorry if I went over the line there. I started by saying that very thing - I said I had a reason to have a very strong opinion about who I could trust, I didn't know how much I could say about why and then I got pressed for details. I did not say anything about what was said in my PM.
|
|
|
Post by Noodle on Mar 17, 2009 13:29:18 GMT -5
What "reason to have a very strong opinion" could you have as a plain townie, Soylent? It just doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to me, if your role is as you claim.
|
|
|
Post by soylentred on Mar 17, 2009 13:32:12 GMT -5
Now, now, you should never use a big word when a diminutive one will suffice. You referred to me having bipolar antics - I can tell you to knock it off in plainer words if you like.
|
|
|
Post by Noodle on Mar 17, 2009 13:39:19 GMT -5
That doesn't answer my question, Soy.
|
|
|
Post by soylentred on Mar 17, 2009 13:46:20 GMT -5
That doesn't answer my question, Soy. I answered your question before by saying - 'read what I have already said at least 3 times' and you ask me again, and then you ask me again and then Sint says I shouldn't have said it in the first place. I am going to do this unvote Nazdakka
vote Noodle
|
|
|
Post by soylentred on Mar 17, 2009 13:49:43 GMT -5
forgot the colons - don't think they are required but just in case.
unvote: Nazdakka
vote: Noodle
|
|
|
Post by Noodle on Mar 17, 2009 13:57:56 GMT -5
Say, I asked you questions which you refused to explicitly answer, and when I press you for an answer you react with kneejerk aggression. Suspicious?
|
|
|
Post by soylentred on Mar 17, 2009 14:06:47 GMT -5
Noodle you said you were reading to catch up on what happened while you were not involved. I suggested that you read all of the discussion we had without you - read how I explained it already especially since Sint is now saying perhaps I should not have said it. Can people just stay away and then I have to repeat everything I already said over 3 pages or are people expected to read the previous discussion ?
I am not trying to be snotty here but if I am AFK, I read what happened and then jump in.
|
|