Liquid Evil
Full Member
The silver in my eyes cuts through any lies.
Posts: 219
|
Post by Liquid Evil on Jan 30, 2009 15:52:13 GMT -5
Night 1: You- 1960's Night 2: Sitro- 1980's Night 3: Unable to investigate because I was lured into an all night smoking session by Soylentred (i.e. she tried to recruit me but the attempt failed since I'm a power role)
|
|
|
Post by soylentred on Jan 30, 2009 16:03:24 GMT -5
Wow Liquid you were smoking something but it wasn't with me. Not sure why you all are so willing to throw your lot in with him.
As it has been said before...
Liquid and fish smell bad after 3 days
Vote Liquid
|
|
|
Post by soylentred on Jan 30, 2009 16:04:20 GMT -5
Goltar I am still willing to support you if you are willing to support me.
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Jan 30, 2009 16:04:38 GMT -5
Don't worry, my teammates will know what wiki article to look for to validate my claim.
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Jan 30, 2009 16:06:21 GMT -5
And since you don't know which article to look for goltar, that should prove to all how much of a hippie you really are.
|
|
|
Post by goltar on Jan 30, 2009 16:38:09 GMT -5
First, I never watched Napoleon Dynamite. I have no desire to at this time, and did not at the time it came out. Frankly, the obsession with it annoys me.
Second, let's assume liquid is telling the truth and Hendrix didn't mess with him. Both quite possible. That makes me 60's. That would also make soylent 60's. That's 2. There is at an absolute minimum 1 more. That means that there will be 1 remaining, who has likely blended in with another team already, ready to eat them from the inside. Or has gone near inactive.
For the record, I do enjoy the game, and have no plans to just fade away under liquid's accusations.
|
|
Liquid Evil
Full Member
The silver in my eyes cuts through any lies.
Posts: 219
|
Post by Liquid Evil on Jan 30, 2009 16:48:10 GMT -5
Sint is probably the 3rd 60's player.
Where's your posse of 2000's Nole? I'm spoonfeeding you this victory, but if Soy recruits tonight it's going to be a much harder uphill battle.
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Jan 30, 2009 16:50:07 GMT -5
Well, if soy survives the day, then we can forget all that we have learned, as a sucessful recruitment tonight sways everything into the 60's favor.
|
|
Liquid Evil
Full Member
The silver in my eyes cuts through any lies.
Posts: 219
|
Post by Liquid Evil on Jan 30, 2009 17:14:37 GMT -5
The votes on me are as follows: Nolecub (you never unvoted me), Nazdakka, goltar, Sint, and Soy (the last three are obvious 60's).
Ah well, it was pretty much understood that I would die Day 3 regardless. Hopefully you guys got it of your systems and next game won't be a pure countdown.
Good luck 2000's (and my last 80's teammate if you still exist). *throws a liquid-shaped gang sign* I'm out dawg.
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Jan 30, 2009 17:38:45 GMT -5
Actually, my vote on you came at end of day yesterday, right before Sitro was cast off. So the votes on you now would be Naz and That 60's Show.
We need Naz to switch his vote NOW, and for 2 of those who are not around to cast a vote for Soy.
Your nomination vote for me stands whether you are cast out or not.
|
|
sint
Full Member
Posts: 105
|
Post by sint on Jan 30, 2009 17:50:40 GMT -5
Actually LE, you should've known better. I've been role dropping like crazy.
I already said I wasn't 60's. Making a plan that involves your own sides death while it's far from over just doesn't cut it. However conviniently in your plan you don't answer what happens if soy is NOT 60's but you are. Boom instant victory? Thanks...
|
|
|
Post by water_moon on Jan 30, 2009 18:05:35 GMT -5
W_m, (or who ever..) did I read correctly that you cannot unvote your vote for the leading role? Which means it's not something to throw around so easily. This is correct. The end vote is set in stone. A bet placed can not be altered.
|
|
sint
Full Member
Posts: 105
|
Post by sint on Jan 31, 2009 7:54:54 GMT -5
So I found some more time.. here's an interesting question LE: You investigated goltar and found him to be 60's on your first night (so opposing team). Why didn't you even mention him on day one, nor focus attention on him what-so-ever? You investigated sitro and found him to be 80's on your second night (so friendly team). Why did you focus attention on him? You know as well as I do that where ever people speak up or mention names the chopping block will go. Why lead your own teammember to the gallows and not one on the most powerful team?
Oh well, it's ok, you're 60's and nole is too. I recommend killing LE now and then aim for one of the 2k's. That plan should be supported by all sides.
|
|
|
Post by goltar on Jan 31, 2009 10:26:24 GMT -5
I'm tending to agree with sint here. Liquid is certainly up to his usual tricks. Which means we absolutely need him to be eliminated today. And since he supported nolecub early, coupled with nolecub being such an obvious guru target with two support votes, nolecub needs to be eliminated tomorrow.
I don't trust liquid's plan, as he is almost certainly lying somewhere. He likely knows one of his teammates and has put them somewhere else to get them a free pass to the end game. He will do whatever it takes to win, but he will not easily hand the victory to another team when he still has hope.
|
|
|
Post by goltar on Jan 31, 2009 10:54:44 GMT -5
And another point regarding the guru, whether soylent or not. We've eliminated two non-roles, both 80's. I'd feel comfortable saying that ric did not have a role, as players with roles are less likely to drop out than players with roles. We can't speculate his team though. That leaves 9 players, and 6 (7 if the office toady's boss is included) roles. Take liquid out and that leaves 8 players with (assuming he's the snoop as I expect) 5-6 roles and 2-3 non-roles. If ALL non-roles are recruitable, that gives at most a 37.5% chance for the guru to hit someone recruitable. Obviously not good. Couple that with a 50% chance for the guru to be revealed on hitting someone non-recruitable, even with at least 2 possibilities being on the guru's team, and it's not looking good for the guru.
Now, assuming soylent is the guru, this sways things a bit. She's already been revealed by liquid, and as such is less concerned about being revealed again. It will confirm what liquid has said, but not much more than that.
Either way, guru or not, I'm willing to support soylent for the moment. The likelihood of an actual recruitment succeeding at this point is small, and soylent has supported me, which is more than I can say for liquid.
|
|