|
Post by nolecub on Feb 6, 2009 9:42:08 GMT -5
Nac is going to be fired for insubordination regardless of his actions. When I am revealed to NOT have been recruited at end of day, I will call the sniveling washed up office toddy to the carpet and force him to grovel and beg for mercy. Then I will fire him with such verocity, that even Donald Trump will shake in his boots.
|
|
sint
Full Member
Posts: 105
|
Post by sint on Feb 6, 2009 10:02:24 GMT -5
But I expect a public apology tomorrow from each and everyone of you. Something along the lines of "I am sorry Nole, I should have believed you, I can't believe I was such an idiot." Because the only plan that will secure a 2K victory, is leaving me in the cast. 1. I will not apologise for playing the best game and being right. How about you apologise for trying to counter it for so long? 2. Dude, you just agreed that the ONLY plan securing a 2k victory is NOT leaving you in the cast. Just stop trying.. Nac Runo: This is up to you. Do you want to win outright or not? Your call. If you want to win the game, you vote me off, and Nole takes it home. He will get the part, and you will have fulfilled the objective of the role you were assigned. However, if you want to completely ignore your assigned objective of getting your boss, Nolecub, the part, and end up with a sort-of win by getting another 2000s person the role, you vote Nole off. Someone from the 2000s will get the role, but even if it's you, you still won't be the outright winner because you ignored what your were supposed to be trying to achieve. True, I said this earlier, I understand if nac goes for the role win and keep nole alive. It is up to him and we can't really say one play or the other is better for him. On the one hand his team wins, on the other hand he wins by completing his role.
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Feb 6, 2009 10:07:46 GMT -5
sint, I will accept your apologies first...after Nac is fired of course.
|
|
|
Post by Nazdakka on Feb 6, 2009 10:27:48 GMT -5
Sint: My reading of the rules and my role PM is that the primary objective of the game is to get the role for yourself (or, in Nac's case, get it for Nolecub). The team win is a secondary objective - nice, but not nearly as good as the personal one.
For what it's worth, I'm baffled by the play of yourself and Liquid. Per the rules and what I believe to be the intention of the designer, a 2000s win is a flat loss for you. Deciding that you've won that way feels a bit like... say it's half time of a soccer match and you're 3-0 down. You go out for the second half and say "My new objective is to score no goals and help the other team win", and go on to declare victory when that happens.
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Feb 6, 2009 10:30:49 GMT -5
The reason for that is because this game generated into a my team vs. your team competition. That wasn't the original purpose, but it has made the game more lively and generated a lot more conversation.
|
|
|
Post by nolecub on Feb 6, 2009 10:40:18 GMT -5
Win condition: Last man standing (unless you're a toddy). Secondary win condition, be on winner's team.
|
|
sint
Full Member
Posts: 105
|
Post by sint on Feb 6, 2009 11:36:20 GMT -5
The reason for that is because this game generated into a my team vs. your team competition. That wasn't the original purpose, but it has made the game more lively and generated a lot more conversation. You're forgetting that the 80's basically got butchered 1 after another.. we had no chance of winning this game.
|
|
|
Post by water_moon on Feb 6, 2009 16:18:04 GMT -5
It's night, let's see who's here: Nac and sint voted off nole, nole and naz voted off naz, but the votes were on nole first and noodle never voted. Rather he attempted to take his support from nole. So we say goodbye tonight to nole. We look forward to your rendition of James Lancaster later this year, but please don't tell the cannons "You're Fired" That phrase is trademarked and we can't afford a lawsuit. nole is 2000And I just have to address: The reason for that is because this game generated into a my team vs. your team competition. That wasn't the original purpose, but it has made the game more lively and generated a lot more conversation. Says who?
|
|
|
Post by water_moon on Feb 6, 2009 17:16:47 GMT -5
Now we have one support vote for Nazdaka and one for Nac Runo.
For whom do you want the lead role? This day will last 24 hours. If there is a tie, the roles will be split and both will win though the glory will be lessened.
|
|
|
Post by Nazdakka on Feb 6, 2009 17:36:20 GMT -5
Vote NazdakkaObviously
|
|
sint
Full Member
Posts: 105
|
Post by sint on Feb 6, 2009 17:41:12 GMT -5
Fine by me.. vote nazvote nac would be quite the hilarious turn around if I would support naz huh?
|
|
|
Post by Nazdakka on Feb 6, 2009 17:51:42 GMT -5
Looks like nobody got recruited Vote for me!
|
|
|
Post by Nazdakka on Feb 6, 2009 17:58:11 GMT -5
Come on Sint, your team is neutral in all of this. Make it even and have a tie between your rivals Vote for me!
|
|
|
Post by Nac Runo on Feb 6, 2009 18:27:54 GMT -5
vote: NacRunoAs you have requested, i am sorry nolecub that i made you leave the game. However as you know i had no other choice in order to know the truth. I will make sure to apologize again once the round is over. sint: Thanks for your support vote, and as you know no matter what naz says you can only win by supporting me. Noodle: We only need your support to win the game as 2k's, i am sure you wouldn't support someone who confessed being 60's but just wanted to remind
|
|
|
Post by Nazdakka on Feb 6, 2009 18:58:26 GMT -5
sint: My 'vote for me' speech is this... I have been actually playing this game and planning my moves. I laid low early on because that was the best way to avoid undue attention. I voted to get rid of Liquid because he's a smart cookie and seemed to be out to get my team. I knowingly ditched both of my team-mates (I'm the hippy, and so knew about both Goltar and Soy) because there was no point fighting out a losing battle in their defense. I tried to save Nolecub because I thought that was my best chance to save the game for my team. Nac hasn't played the game. He made no particular effort to get Nolecub the role, and actually voted him off, completely ignoring the assigned objective of his role. Your team, the 1980s, has lost. There's no way around that. However, you can still affect the result. You and other members of your team have helped the 2000s out an awful lot, yet I've still made it to the final in spite of that. How about you now do something to even the balance, and throw the 1960s a bone, to match up all the help that the 2000s got? PS: Nac would like you to think that a 2000s win is a win for you. Consider, though, how a deadlock between your rivals would look. The '80s still wouldn't have scored the outright victory they wanted, but they would have managed to prevent both of their rivals from achieving one.
|
|