|
Post by Nac Runo on Nov 6, 2008 6:31:54 GMT -5
Says the guy who specializes in getting the town to trust him despite his frequent mafia-ness. Well, you see, at least i am predictable . Noodle: I never though goltar to be impartial either. I just needed another reason for my vote. Do you have anything aganist muzzz to back up your gut feeling btw? @water_moon: Do you have a guess for N1 kills? @liq: Who do you think the doc should protect first night? Every mafia game has some observant, silent baddies. Bob should start talking soon as he is the only one fitting to that description currently. I never even saw maat sign on to the forum so i am not that worried about her for now.
|
|
|
Post by Jason Maher on Nov 6, 2008 10:06:03 GMT -5
Liquid: is your suspicion based on anything concrete?
|
|
|
Post by raypatean on Nov 6, 2008 10:34:18 GMT -5
I am sure at least one wrestler has posted already, who is the top suspect? This post seems pretty suspicious to me. Calling attention to others, while being a seemingly helpful post, but giving no real information whatsoever. It is a very nice way to take attention from yourself and put it on others. I got my eye on you, foo'.
|
|
Liquid Evil
Full Member
The silver in my eyes cuts through any lies.
Posts: 219
|
Post by Liquid Evil on Nov 6, 2008 11:46:33 GMT -5
@ Cyg- I could never forget you...
@ Nac- The doc should protect whoever they believe the mafia will target. Same as every night. I don't see the point of listing specific names because mafia and doc actions should be independent of whatever is stated in terms of protection requests or voiced save candidates.
@ Jason- Anything "concrete?" Pretty obviously not. (Though I suppose it's possible that I could be the cop and had investigated him, but that would just lead to further madness with a lame day 1 power role claim.) I'm just trying to gauge people's reaction to a seemingly random vote. Regardless of the motive, only you and Noodle addressed it out of the six posters to follow it. So either you are the only one that cares for Noodle or you're the only one that doesn't think I'm full of myself with apparent random "I'm sure" votes.
unvote: Noodle
|
|
|
Post by jrlafrance on Nov 6, 2008 12:27:17 GMT -5
Well, I do think you are full of yourself LE, but that's besides the point!
As usual, this early in the game, I'm not getting a reading on anyone.
|
|
Liquid Evil
Full Member
The silver in my eyes cuts through any lies.
Posts: 219
|
Post by Liquid Evil on Nov 6, 2008 13:12:09 GMT -5
@ Nacruno- Did you know who Mr. T was before you wikipedia'd him?
@ BobTheWarrior- Where you at?
|
|
|
Post by bobthewarrior on Nov 6, 2008 13:18:06 GMT -5
Sorry, real life is getting in the way.
@le - if you throw a dart in the dark, how would you know who you hit?
Noodle is suspicious to me for asking for more posts. A valid want, but everyone else wants as well, why voice it unless you're trying to look active?
jrlafrance is suspicious to me for agreeing with Noodle. Who in their right mind agrees with Noodle? Maybe Wrasslers?
Nac Runo is suspicious to me for voting for W_M. His reasons are completely opposite of my views of W_M. His 2nd point is an accusation of her character as a person, not as a player, IMO.
FBZ - Odd. Blames the EU's. Defends that he isn't calling them any names, then proceeds to vote for one while claiming it's random. Odd.
@nac - I am far from observant. I suspect of the four people that I think are suspicious, all of them will be proven wrong by the end of the game, if you look at my track record.
@le again - Never you mind, don't worry your pretty little head about me.
|
|
|
Post by Nac Runo on Nov 6, 2008 14:07:33 GMT -5
@liq: Yes.
@bob: I had as much reason for my vote as any first day vote needs to have. I didn't try to accuse anyone of anything even one bit. You seem to be too sure about your suspect list. Than who gets your vote for the first day?
|
|
|
Post by jrlafrance on Nov 6, 2008 14:09:09 GMT -5
@nac - I am far from observant. I suspect of the four people that I think are suspicious, all of them will be proven wrong by the end of the game, if you look at my track record. Care to enlighten us on who those 4 people might be?
|
|
Liquid Evil
Full Member
The silver in my eyes cuts through any lies.
Posts: 219
|
Post by Liquid Evil on Nov 6, 2008 15:32:59 GMT -5
Vote: Nac Runo
For: -posting information he already knew in an attempt to appear helpful without any real content -voting w_m simply because her host is the husband, implying goltar was biased, and keeping his vote on her for no real reasons otherwise (and I didn't really buy the "irrational" argument) -asking questions pertaining to NK and save targets (questions like that are pure speculation and can sometimes work against the town) -Isn't that enough for Day 1?
|
|
|
Post by Nazdakka on Nov 6, 2008 15:37:53 GMT -5
Vote NacRuno
Reasoning:
Neither of these are good reasons to cast a vote.
On preview: Pwned by Liquid.
|
|
|
Post by Nazdakka on Nov 6, 2008 15:40:17 GMT -5
Well, I guess what I mean is that silly day 1 votes generally look like just that - silly. Nac Runo said his vote was serious, but his stated reasons didn't make much sense.
|
|
|
Post by jrlafrance on Nov 6, 2008 16:25:06 GMT -5
Wow, 2 quick votes for Nac Runo! How can we be assured that LE and Nazdakka are not the 2 wrasslers? Both posts came at such close timing...
|
|
|
Post by Nac Runo on Nov 6, 2008 16:45:47 GMT -5
@liq:
- I can not possibly post something i do not know. If you are referring to my Mr.T post i had no idea someone would find it even seemingly helpful since it is just OT blather as my first post. - I am not implying goltar to be biased in anyway, and i do not see neither goltar nor w_m taking that comment of mine personal, which is the right thing to do. I remember too well that same thing came up in the previous game goltar hosted and he had given answer to that without leaving any doubt. - Didn't get that one actually. The questions i asked were my way making things going for me. It is strange you of all is the one questioning that. - I can not say something for that.
@naz:
I do not get where you read my vote being more serious than others. My vote is where i first cast it because i do not have anywhere else to vote right now. I am not trying to push for w_m's lynch either so i really do not know how you did get that impression.
|
|
|
Post by bobthewarrior on Nov 6, 2008 16:57:13 GMT -5
@nac - I am far from observant. I suspect of the four people that I think are suspicious, all of them will be proven wrong by the end of the game, if you look at my track record. Care to enlighten us on who those 4 people might be? Hmmm . . . I thought it was obvious, I only named four people in my post. Well, here you go: Noodle You Nac Runo FBZ
|
|